Social CRM Strategies for Sales
Having implemented your Social CRM marketing strategies, it’s time to complete the Virtuous Cycle by implementing a few strategies around sales. The marketing to sales handoff has always involved a certain amount of drama in my experience:
VP of Sales: “I don’t have enough leads!”
VP of Marketing: “You’re not following up on the leads I gave you!”
Much of this discord seems to relate to the definition of a “lead”. (And no, I’m not going to dive into the even more contentious definitional world of terminology over what we call these things we give to sales). That’s up to each organization to decide – but unless sales and marketing are on the same page, there’s going to be trouble.
Clearly, the sales team is expecting the “lead” to have reached a level of discernible buying interest. We’ve seen that tools like lead nurturing communities with lead scoring can help identify the buying interest before the sales team contacts the lead. I will suggest that in addition to having discernable buying interest, there is another operational difference that comes into play when the lead moves from marketing to sales: the lead is ready to receive more personalized information about the product or services being sold.
What do I mean by “more personalized information?” The idea of ‘question asking’ comes readily to mind, but I am not talking about all questions. Many times leads will ask the same kinds of questions because the information they seek is not readily available. Answering those questions that are common across the entire market or at least across vertical markets should more likely be the purview of marketing.
But there will be some personalized questions or information needs. They go to the particular combination of business problems each prospect wishes to solve in the context of how they’re thinking about things. When the need for information becomes sufficiently personalized so that the answers are less and less useful to a broader audience, sales should take over.
Providing a social business process that facilitates the questioning and sharing of answers is an excellent function for Social CRM, BTW. All of the strategies that relate to Social CRM for customer service come into play for this application. After all, you’re trying to efficiently share the expertise of your best subject matter experts – just as in customer service.
Imagine a living social “RFP answering” community. What if you took every question that came with an RFP and put it into your online community as a question (along with the answer) and the ability for others to ask more deeply about the question, or even to answer and discuss? You’d have a powerful tool in your sales and marketing process! Ideally, your prospects and leads could self-service this rich information buffet. However, even if you’re filling out detailed RFP’s, such a knowledge base makes your own people that much more efficient at it.
Clearly some RFP questions would not be appropriate for this kind of treatment. Others would be the sorts of things you would make available only after you validated the person asking very carefully (don’t want to give up too much proprietary information), and so on. But being able to rapidly gather and disseminate the best possible answers would be a rich source of content. We follow similar practices at Helpstream. For example, after holding our Geoffrey Moore Social CRM Chasm Crossing Webinar, we published all of the questions asked, including many we didn’t get to answer during the webinar, including the answers as part of our HelpExchange Community.
What to do about the more personalized information that doesn’t make sense to go into the mainstream “RFP answering” community? Another concept we’ve used to good effect in our communities is that of the VIP Room. We create them for all our customers as repositories for the work products of professional services engagements and training. It beats the heck out of email, and creates a nice personalized information store where each customer shares their Helpstream-specific knowledge in a way that they can collaborate with us and any participating SI’s.
The same principle can be applied to the sales process. Imagine delivering RFP’s, price quotations, professional services SOW’s, marketing collateral, contact Information for key players and all of the other materials that make up the personalized responses to a prospect’s information needs. By gathering such information in one place, it becomes easier for everyone participating in the buying cycle to share information. When the prospect becomes customer, the same VIP Room can search for the ongoing needs of the private collaboration I’ve already described. The sales rep effectively becomes the coordinator and manager of the VIP Room during the sales cycle.
A good social platform needs a variety of capabilities to carry out such a vision. At the very least, it will need very fine grained permission to control who sees what. You don’t want to have to create full communities for each VIP Room. Rather, these should be easily created (hopefully automatically provisioned) gated sub-communities. Imagine a process that works like this:
- The Lead is nurtured until their lead score reaches a critical mass threshold (a lead score) of buying interest based on the content consumption in the Nurturing Community.
- Once the lead score triggers the threshold, a sales rep is assigned to that lead. The rep is automatically subscribed to the activity stream associated with the lead so they can see what they’re doing in the community. This makes it easy for the rep to start naturally engaging right in the community as needed.
- When the rep decides through direct observation and interaction that it’s time, the lead is promoted to an opportunity. A VIP Room is automatically provisioned and the lead is notified of their new VIP Room.
- Interaction proceeds with all the normal channels – email and phone –but the VIP Room is also there to facilitate. Ideally, all slide decks, Webinar recordings and other work artifacts go into the VIP Room for reference by the prospect.
At Helpstream, we refer to the opportunity for sales to understand much more context as “customer awareness.” Interaction with a community brings about an unprecedented opportunity for customer awareness. Used properly, it makes it much easier to understand who is a near-term focus for new business, and who should be further nurtured before engagement. The days of being able to badger customers into becoming new business through constant hard selling are drawing to a close. Smart organizations are helpful, and they certainly ask for the sale… but they never badger.


Reader Comments (5)
Bob, these are great thoughts. I love the idea of graduating online communities that get more personalized as we learn more (through their "digital body language") about our customers. Many buyers prefer to find information on their own in the early parts of the sales cycle before engaging with sales. I can see companies developing these "VIP Rooms" by industry, geography, size of company, job title, or however it best maps to sales territories. With the emergence of new lead scoring methods and philosophies - the measurement of prospect behavior/engagement level in addition to the traditional budget/authority/need/timeframe approach - it will be interesting for companies to analyze which behaviors correlate to the highest value customers and how/if this differs by community as well as the ideal time for sales reps to start interacting with prospects to accelerate the selling/buying process. Are you tracking the ROI of these "customer awareness" approaches? I'd like to hear about customer experiences and success stories!
Bob,
This is an interesting process, yet is just continuing the entire 1:1 selling process that we have become so accustomed to use. Persuasion and manipulation become the sales tools we continue to use. It is not your fault - Helpstream - as the lack of understanding of this new world continues to come from the same sales "professionals" that we always had.
As the relationship model changes, and it will - trust me, from the known 1:1 to a less known 1:1:M (where M is the community that feeds, nurtures, and supports each individual - or communities in some cases) organizations are no longer selling to the "customer" or "lead" or "opportunity". They are selling their communities into the idea of supporting the purchase. And the information and requirements of an entire community are not managed as simply as the ones from an individual. Sure, I hear it all the time "sales will never change from the 1:1 relationships" - but we used to spend fortunes in personalized attention to single clients in customer service as well. It was about getting more people, more personalized service, more 1:1 relationships -- until we realized that they did not want to talk to a human or a person, they wanted an answer.
Guess what? they just want a product or a service - not a relationship.
I can see the models beginning to change, things that we never thought we could buy online (cars? houses? appliances?) being bought online and the 1:1 relationship being transformed into a community support relationship. Prices are no longer a secret, nor are features and -- well, just about everything can be found online now... right?
Wouldn't any sales organization get off the st-- silly model of pushing for 1:1 relationships and "trickery" as a way to get an extra dollar our of the customer in exchange for keeping communities well informed, content, and supporting the individual's need to purchase?
Yeah, I can see how old habits would die hard. Unfortunately, sales has not choice on this one as the customer is dictating the change. I like what you are doing, in part, for now.
But the model has a very limited shelf life and we need someone to begin innovating in social sales.
Anneke, greetings! Long time no talk.
In answer to your question, yes, we are absolutely monitoring the ROI's. We're very metrics oriented at Helpstream. In fact, our product development process thrives on it. We start out introducing fairly generic functionality, but with lots of metrics. We then work with interested customers to refine Best Practices through an analysis of those metrics. When we find Best Practices that are broadly applicable across customers, we then seek to automate them as product features. It's been a very successful methodology for us!
Esteban,
I agree totally with your sentiments. Sales wants pure 1:1 because they want control. I've often seen Salespeople go out of their way not to bring everyone to the table that could help, because they fear that loss of control.
The trouble is, there is little for the customer to gain through a 1:1 relationship, and in this day and age, the customer controls the conversation. Talented salespeople will work this to their advantage. They know the power of references. Instead of references being that final, very formal, almost Victorian Royal Court procedure, they'll be more continuous during the buying cycle, and more customers will be involved.
That's ok and will potentially accelerate both the likelihood of closing and the velocity. The best salespeople I ever worked with always realized the customer was in control, and facilitated that.
Cheers,
BW
hi bob,
found this to be an interesting read on how SCRM can evolve to encompass different facets of CRM and help in the process.
But,I wonder if there are really apps/vendors out there who provide these ?(please correct me if i am wrong here). though even I looked at SCRM in a different manner here @JohnFMoore and I had an interesting discussion on attending a memorial service for SCRM and visitng this baby in the hospital!
My point here is the model suggested is defintely a step in the right direction, but is it too soon too fast? I beleive SCRM is still evolving and needs time to "open its umbrella" over CRM/others. SFDC's service cloud 2 is a definite start in the right direction with its twitter integration. THere is stil a long way to go before actual integration and custom options are made available in this fast growing space.
My two cents though, and any POV's/comments are more than welcome to add more value to this fruitful blog.
Venkat, too soon too fast for whom?
For vendors late getting their act together, perhaps. For customers, there is endless evidence available today that vendors are late to the social media party and that customers are ready to engage today.
You can choose to engage with them and join their conversation, or you can be afraid its too soon and too fast. It doesn't matter to your customers. They're going to be talking about you via social media either way.
You'll be too little too late if your competition figures this out before you have!
Cheers,
BW